Article 5117

Title of the article



Kondrashin Viktor Viktorovich, Doctor of historical sciences, professor, head of sub-department of Russian history, regional ethnography and history teaching methods, Penza State University (40 Krasnaya street, Penza, Russia),
Kornilov Gennady Egorovich, Doctor of historical sciences, professor, head of the sector of economic history, Institute of History and Archaeology of Ural Branch of RAS (16 Sofyi Kovalevskoy street, Ekaterinburg, Russia),
Melnikov Nikita Nikolaevich, Candidate of historical sciences, associate professor, senior staff scientist, Institute of History and Archaeology of Ural Branch of RAS (16 Sofyi Kovalevskoy street, Ekaterinburg, Russia),
Mozokhin Oleg Borisovich, Doctor of historical sciences, professor, Institute of Russian History of RAS
(19 D. Ulyanova street, Moscow, Russia),

Index UDK





Background. In Soviet times, all the archival materials on the military industry of USSR were closed to researchers. A large number of archival documents have re-cently been declassified. It is possible to introduce new documents into scientific circulation. Thus, now, historians can study the process of formation and development of the tank industry of the Soviet Union in the era of industrialization at a higher quality level. The purpose of the work is to consider the history of creation and development of mass production of Soviet tanks from early 1930s till the start of the Great Patriotic War.
Materials and methods. The study was carried out on the basis of unpublished documents from the Archives of the President of the Russian Federation, the Russian State Archive of Economics, the United State Archive of the Chelyabinsk region. A special place in the study was given to the published collection of documents of the series “History and development of the military-industrial complex of Russia and the USSR. 1900–1963”. The problem-chronological method revealed the origins of the key trends and contradictions in the process of implementation of the tank production program, which was being revealed in historical sequence against the general historical background. The principle of objectivity and dialectical understanding of the process of historical development, the recognition of causal regularities of events and phenomena, the important role of the subjective factor in history and a comprehensive approach to the subject allowed the authors to study the formation of the Soviet military-defense complex and tank building.
Results. The main problems of the young Soviet tank industry in the years of Stalin’s industrialization have been displayed by the example of the medium tank T-28 production launch.
Conclusions. The Soviet government really wanted to be armed with a lot of military vehicles. But it did not give due regard to the adoption of new tanks. Therefore, by the mid 1941 there emerged a situation, when the targets, set before the tank industry, couldn’t have been met in full.

Key words

tanks T-28, T-34, KV; diesel engines; tank industry; sabotage.

Download PDF


1. Kolomiets M. V. Sredniy tank T-28. Trekhglavyy monstr Stalina [Medium tank T-28. Stalin’s three-headed monster]. Moscow, 2007.
2. Arkhiv Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii [The Archive of the President of the Russian Federation]. F. 3. Op. 58. D. 342.
3. Istoriya sozdaniya i razvitiya oboronno-promyshlennogo kompleksa Rossii i SSSR. 1900–1963. T. 3: Stanovlenie oboronno-promyshlennogo kompleksa SSSR (1928–1937) [The history of formation and development of the defense-industrial complex of Russia and USSR. 1900–1963. Vol. 3: Establishment of the defense-industrial complex of USSR (1928–1937)]. Ed. by A. A. Kol'tyukov. Moscow, 2010.
4. Istoriya sozdaniya i razvitiya oboronno-promyshlennogo kompleksa Rossii i SSSR. 1900–1963. T. 4: Oboronno-promyshlennyy kompleks SSSR nakanune Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyny (1938 – iyun' 1941) [The history of formation and development of the defense-industrial complex of Russia and USSR. 1900–1963. Vol. 4: The defenseindustrial complex of USSR on the eve of the Great Patriotic War (1938 – June 1941)]. Ed. by A. K. Sokolov. Moscow, 2015.
5. Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy arkhiv ekonomiki (dalee – RGAE) [The Russian State Archive of Economics (RGAE)]. F. 8752. Op. 7. D. 64. L. 3, 10, 11 ob.
6. Kolomiets M. V. KV. «Klim Voroshilov» – tank proryva [KV. “Klim Voroshilov” – the breakthrough tank]. Moscow, 2006.
7. Ob"edinennyy gosudarstvennyy arkhiv Chelyabinskoy oblasti [The United State Archive of Chelyabinsk region]. F. P-288. Op. 42. D. 17. L. 152.
8. Zheltov I., Pavlov M., Pavlov I. Neizvestnyy T-34 [The unknown T-34]. Moscow, 2001.
9. Kolomiets M. V. Frontovaya illyustratsiya [Front-line illustration]. 2003, no. 3.
10. Voennaya letopis'. Bronetankovyy muzey. Vyp. 11: Sovetskiy legkiy tank T-50 i mashiny na ego baze [The military chronicle. The armor museum. Issue 11: The Soviet light tank T-50 and vehicles on its base]. Moscow: BTV-Kniga, 2007.
11. Sokolov A. K. Ot voenproma k VPK: sovetskaya voennaya promyshlennost'. 1917 – iyun' 1941 gg. [From the military industry to the military industrial complex: the Soviet military industry. 1917 – June 1941]. Moscow, 2012.
12. RGAE. F. 8115. Op. 8. D. 77. L. 47, 48.
13. RGAE. F. 8115. Op. 8. D. 79.
14. RGAE. F. 8115. Op. 8. D. 30. L. 85.
15. RGAE. F. 8115. Op. 8. D. 97. L. 55.


Дата создания: 08.08.2017 13:18
Дата обновления: 08.08.2017 15:01